Percorrer por autor "Verdasca, Nuno"
A mostrar 1 - 10 de 29
Resultados por página
Opções de ordenação
- Agentes infecciosos e cancroPublication . Oleastro, Mónica; Verdasca, Nuno
- An Overview of Monkeypox Virus Detection in Different Clinical Samples and Analysis of Temporal Viral Load DynamicsPublication . Cordeiro, Rita; Pelerito, Ana; de Carvalho, Isabel Lopes; Lopo, Sílvia; Neves, Raquel; Rocha, Raquel; Palminha, Paula; Verdasca, Nuno; Palhinhas, Cláudia; Borrego, Maria José; Manita, Carla; Ferreira, Idalina; Bettencourt, Célia; Vieira, Patrícia; Silva, Sónia; Água-Doce, Ivone; Roque, Carla; Cordeiro, Dora; Brondani, Greice; Santos, João Almeida; Martins, Susana; Rodrigues, Irene; Ribeiro, Carlos; Núncio, Maria Sofia; Gomes, João Paulo; Batista, Fernando da ConceiçãoMpox is a zoonotic disease caused by the Monkeypox virus (MPXV), and since May 2022, tens of thousands of cases have been reported in non-endemic countries. We aimed to evaluate the suitability of different sample types for mpox diagnostic and assess the temporal dynamics of viral load. We evaluated 1914 samples from 953 laboratory-confirmed cases. The positivity rate was higher for lesion (91.3%) and rectal swabs (86.1%) when compared with oropharyngeal swabs (69.5%) and urines (41.2%), indicating higher viral loads for the former. Supporting this, lesion and rectal swabs showed lower median PCR C values (C = 23 and C = 24), compared to oropharyngeal swabs and urines (C = 31). Stable MPXV loads were observed in swabs from lesions up to 30 days after symptoms onset, contrasting with a considerable decrease in viral load in rectal and oropharyngeal swabs. Overall, these results point to lesion swabs as the most suitable samples for detecting MPXV in the 2022-2023 multicountry outbreak and show comparable accuracy to rectal swabs up to 8 days after symptoms onset. These findings, together with the observation that about 5% of patients were diagnosed through oropharyngeal swabs while having negative lesions, suggest that multisite testing should be performed to increase diagnostic sensitivity.
- Carcinoma espino-celular verrucoso da mão em doente com infecção HIVPublication . Vasconcelos, Pedro; Lopez, D.; Verdasca, Nuno; Esteves, R.; Tapadinhas, C.
- Clinical Performance of the CLART Human Papillomavirus 2 Assay Compared With the Hybrid Capture 2 TestPublication . Pista, Angela; Verdasca, Nuno; Oliveira, AnaPersistent infection by high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is a cause of cervical cancer. The use of HPV detection in cervical screening programs may improve the ability to identify women at risk of cervical cancer. Therefore, the development of appropriate methods for the detection of HR-HPV is essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the CLART Human Papillomavirus 2 assay (CLART) in comparison with the Hybrid Capture 2 test (HC2), using a clinical cut-off of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. Discrepant results were analyzed further by the PapilloCheck HPV genotyping system. In the 425 studied women, HR-HPV positivity rates were similar by both tests (CLART-13 HR-HPV: 63.1%; CLART-17 HR-HPV: 64.7%; HC2: 64.5%). Agreement between CLART-13 HR-HPV (k¼ 0.969; concordance level 98.6%), CLART-17 HR-HPV (k¼ 0.974; concordance level 98.8%), and HC2 were very good. When 13 HR-HPV types were considered, the two tests showed a clinical sensitivity of 96% (95% CI: 92.6–97.9). The clinical specificity of CLART-13 HR-HPV was 73.6% (95% CI: 66.7–79.5) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, which was comparable to HC2 (71.4%; 95% CI: 64.3–77.5). When all 17 HR-HPV types were considered, CLART showed a clinical sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI: 93.8–98.5) and a clinical specificity of 71.9% (95% CI: 64.9–78.0). In conclusion, the CLART assay is efficient, sensitive, reproducible, and has a similar performance to HC2 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. Furthermore, this assay has the advantage of detecting and genotyping 35 HPV types by a single test, which can provide additional information on the predictive value of infection with HR-HPV
- Collaborative study Brazil-Portugal - alidation of HPV lyophilized samples for the control of molecular testsPublication . Menezes, Maria Elizabeth; Fedrizzi, Edson Natal; Correa, José Abol; Cochicho, Daniela; Martins, Luís; Cunha, Mário; Ornelas, Carmo; Verdasca, Nuno; Faria, Ana PaulaThere are about 120 types of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV). The major importance about it is the oncogenic potential of some types. They are referred as a high and low risk for oncogenic potential. Given the importance of the disease it causes, and the use of different laboratorial techniques, mainly techniques of molecular biology, it is mandatory to have an External Quality Assurance (EQA) program base on harmonized standards that rely on consistent controls. The participation in EQA’s programs is mandatory in laboratorieswith an ISO 15189/17025 accreditation implemented. The control of Molecular Biology techniques is absolutely necessary for the quality assurance of the results, the tracking and monitorization of the performance of the reagents. However, one of its limitations is the stability, homogeneity of the material, (ISO/IEC 17043:2010 requisite) as well as the availability of control samples adequate for the parameter to be analyzed. The PNCQ, in order to fill this gap, lyophilised the HPV samples control. In order to do the validation and to test the reproducibility of these lyophilized samples, PNCQ sent to IBIOTECNO , INSA-PNAEQ -DDI and the IPOLFG-SPCLV to be analysed by different methods and reagents in two different countries and different laboratories.
- COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Hospitalization in Older Adults, VEBIS Hospital Network, Europe, September 2024-May 2025Publication . Rojas-Castro, Madelyn; Verdasca, Nuno; Monge, Susana; De Mot, Laurane; Trobajo-Sanmartín, Camino; Duffy, Róisín; Túri, Gergő; Kuliese, Monika; Duerrwald, Ralf; Borg, Maria-Louise; Popovici, Odette; Gomez, Verónica; Makarić, Zvjezdana Lovrić; Launay, Odile; Marques, Diogo F.P.; Pozo, Francisco; Witdouck, Arne; Martínez-Baz, Iván; Fitzgerald, Margaret; Oroszi, Beatrix; Jančorienė, Ligita; Buda, Silke; Dziugyte, Ausra; Lazăr, Mihaela; Machado, Ausenda; Tabain, Irena; Nguyen, Liem Binh Luong; Wagner, Eva Rivas; Dufrasne, François; Castilla, Jesús; Domegan, Lisa; Velkey, Viktória; Majauskaite, Fausta; Hackmann, Carolin; Nicolay, Nathalie; Bacci, Sabrina; Rose, Angela M.C.; European Hospital Vaccine Effectiveness GroupWe estimated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization in patients ≥ 60 years with severe acute respiratory infection, using a multicenter, test-negative, case-control study across seven sites in six European countries between September 2024 and May 2025. We included 352 cases (115 vaccinated; 33%) and 9980 controls (5024 vaccinated; 50%). VE was 42% (95% CI: 15; 61) 14-59 days post-vaccination, 32% (95% CI: -1; 54) at 60-119 days, and 36% (95% CI: 2; 60) at 120-179 days, and no effect thereafter. Among adults aged 60-79 and ≥ 80 years, we observed moderate VE against COVID-19 hospitalization for up to 2 and 4 months, respectively.
- COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Medically Attended Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Target Groups in Europe, October 2024-January 2025, VEBIS Primary Care NetworkPublication . Delaunay, Charlotte Laniece; Verdasca, Nuno; Monge, Susana; Domegan, Lisa; Sève, Noémie; Buda, Silke; Meijer, Adam; Lucaccioni, Héloïse; Torrijos, Miriam López; McKenna, Adele; Enouf, Vincent; Dürrwald, Ralf; In't Velt, Eline; Laiglesia, Mª Ángel de Valcárcel; Bennett, Charlene; Masse, Shirley; Erdwiens, Annika; Hooiveld, Mariette; Mlinarić, Ivan; Túri, Gergő; Rodrigues, Ana Paula; Martínez-Baz, Iván; Lazar, Mihaela; Latorre-Margalef, Neus; Borges, Vitor; Kaczmarek, Marlena; Bacci, Sabrina; Kissling, Esther; European primary care VE groupWe estimated the effectiveness of 2024/25 COVID-19 vaccination against medically attended SARS-CoV-2 infection in Europe, among target groups. We included 3204 patients (8/139 cases vaccinated: 6%; 517/3065 controls vaccinated: 17%) from a multicentre, test-negative design study at primary care level. Vaccine effectiveness was 66% (95% CI: 34-85) overall, 73% (95% CI: 21-94) and 54% (95% CI: -3 to 83) in the first and second months post-vaccination, respectively. Overall vaccine effectiveness was 67% (95% CI: 33-86) among older adults (≥ 60 or ≥ 65 years). This relatively high COVID-19 VE (compared with previous seasons), as well as trends by time since vaccination, should be confirmed with additional data, as sample size was low.
- COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness in Autumn and Winter 2022 to 2023 Among Older EuropeansPublication . Laniece Delaunay, Charlotte; Mazagatos, Clara; Martínez-Baz, Iván; Túri, Gergő; Goerlitz, Luise; Domegan, Lisa; Meijer, Adam; Rodrigues, Ana Paula; Sève, Noémie; Ilić, Maja; Latorre-Margalef, Neus; Lazar, Mihaela; Maurel, Marine; Melo, Aryse; Andreu Ivorra, Blanca; Casado, Itziar; Horváth, Judit Krisztina; Buda, Silke; Bennett, Charlene; de Lange, Marit; Guiomar, Raquel; Enouf, Vincent; Mlinarić, Ivan; Samuelsson Hagey, Tove; Dinu, Sorin; Rumayor, Mercedes; Castilla, Jesús; Oroszi, Beatrix; Dürrwald, Ralf; O’Donnell, Joan; Hooiveld, Mariëtte; Gómez, Verónica; Falchi, Alessandra; Kurečić Filipović, Sanja; Dillner, Lena; Popescu, Rodica; Bacci, Sabrina; Kaczmarek, Marlena; Kissling, Esther; Gallardo García, Virtudes; Perez Morilla, Esteban; Pedrosa Corral, Irene; García Vázquez, Miriam; Milagro-Beamonte, Ana; Fernandez Ibañez, Ana; Margolles Martins, Mario; Giménez Duran, Jaume; Sastre Palou, Bartolomé; López Causapé, Carla; Viloria Raymundo, Luis Javier; Vega Alonso, Tomás; Ordax Díez, Ana; Lozano Alonso, Jose Eugenio; Rojo Bello, Silvia; Mendioroz, Jacobo; Basile, Luca; Martínez Mateo, Ana Isabel; Ruiz de Porras, Carlota; Moya Garcés, Alba; Marcos, Mª Ángeles; López Maside, Aurora; Botella Quijal, Francesc; Miralles Espi, Maite; Andreu Salete, Cristina; García Rodríguez, María del Carmen; Linares, Juan Antonio; García Comas, Luis; Barranco, Mª Isabel; Chirlaque, María-Dolores; Moreno Docón, Antonio; Ramos Marín, Violeta; Castrillejo, Daniel; Gómez Anés, Atanasio; Larrauro, Amparo; Pérez-Gimeno, Gloria; Lozano Álvarez, Marcos; Vega, Lorena; Galindo, Silvia; Puma, Tania; Monge, Susana; Pozo, Francisco; Casas, Inmaculada; Sandonis, Virginia; Vázquez-Morón, Sonia; Echeverría, Aitziber; Trobajo-Sanmartín, Camino; García Cenoz, Manuel; Ezpeleta, Guillermo; Ezpeleta, Carmen; Navascués, Ana; Krisztalovics, Katalin; Mucsányiné Juhász, Krisztina; Kristóf, Katalin; Preuss, Ute; Wedde, Marianne; Biere, Barbara; Reiche, Janine; Oh, Djin-Ye; McKenna, Adele; Connell, Jeff; Joyce, Michael; Bagheri, Mariam; Bos, Sanne; van den Brink, Sharon; Dijkstra, Frederika; Eggink, Dirk; van Gageldonk-Lafeber, Rianne; Goderski, Gabriel; Herrebrugh, Chantal; Jenniskens, Liz; Reukers, Daphne; Sluimer, John; Sprong, Tara; Teirlinck, Anne; Veldhijzen, Nienke; van der Burgh, Ruben; Kager, Cathrien; Klinkhamer, Mayra; Knottnerus, Bart; Riethof, Marloes; van den Broek, Ruud; Wortel, Safira; Machado, Ausenda; Kislaya, Irina; Aniceto, Carlos; Gomes, Licínia; Verdasca, Nuno; Henriques, Camila; Dias, Daniela; Lança, Miguel; Blanchon, Thierry; Guerrisi, Caroline; Renard, Aubane; Launay, Titouan; Masse, Shirley; Chazelle, Marie; Ferenčak, Ivana; Kaić, Bernard; Višekruna Vučina, Vesna; Čusek Adamić, Katica; Kosanović Ličina, Mirjana Lana; Lakošeljac, Danijela; Mihin Huskić, Ivana; Nonković, Diana; Carnahan, Annasara; Hansson-Pihlainen, Eva; Arvesen, Elin; Nid, Nora; Hansen, Anna-Lena; Andersson, Emmi; Dillner, Lena; Jidovu, Adrian; Timnea, Olivia Carmen; Pascu, Cătălina; Oprea, Mihaela; Bistriceanu, Iulia; Ivanciuc, Alina; Mihai, Maria Elena; VEBIS Primary Care Vaccine Effectiveness GroupKey Points: - Question: What was the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines administered in autumn and winter 2022 to 2023 against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection among people aged 60 years or older in Europe, and how did different exposed or reference groups affect effectiveness? - Findings: In this case-control study of 9308 primary care patients at 11 European sites, within 3 months of vaccination, all COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (CVE) estimates were 29% to 39% against SARS-CoV-2 viruses and 44% to 52% against the XBB variants. All point estimates decreased by time after vaccination, with no vaccine protection after 6 months. - Meaning: Findings of this study suggest that COVID-19 vaccination campaigns should precede peaks in SARS-CoV-2 incidence and that effectiveness of new vaccines against emerging variants should be continually monitored using seasonal CVE approaches.
- Effectiveness of the XBB.1.5 COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Hospitalisation Among Adults Aged ≥ 65 Years During the BA.2.86/JN.1 Predominant Period, VEBIS Hospital Study, Europe, November 2023 to May 2024Publication . Antunes, Liliana; Rojas-Castro, Madelyn; Lozano, Marcos; Martínez-Baz, Iván; Leroux-Roels, Isabel; Borg, Maria-Louise; Oroszi, Beatrix; Fitzgerald, Margaret; Dürrwald, Ralf; Jancoriene, Ligita; Machado, Ausenda; Petrović, Goranka; Lazar, Mihaela; Součková, Lenka; Bacci, Sabrina; Howard, Jennifer; Verdasca, Nuno; Basile, Luca; Castilla, Jesús; Ternest, Silke; Džiugytė, Aušra; Túri, Gergő; Duffy, Roisin; Hackmann, Carolin; Kuliese, Monika; Gomez, Verónica; Makarić, Zvjezdana Lovrić; Marin, Alexandru; Husa, Petr; Nicolay, Nathalie; Rose, Angela M.C.; VEBIS SARI VE network teamWe estimated the effectiveness of the adapted monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 hospitalisation during the BA.2.86/JN.1 lineage-predominant period using a multicentre test-negative case-control study in Europe. We included older adults (≥ 65 years) hospitalised with severe acute respiratory infection from November 2023 to May 2024. Vaccine effectiveness was 46% at 14-59 days and 34% at 60-119 days, with no effect thereafter. The XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines conferred protection against BA.2.86 lineage hospitalisation in the first 4 months post-vaccination.
- Effectiveness of the XBB.1.5 COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Hospitalisation Among Adults Aged ≥ 65 Years During the BA.2.86/JN.1 Predominant Period, VEBIS Hospital Study, Europe, November 2023 to May 2024Publication . Antunes, Liliana; Rojas-Castro, Madelyn; Lozano, Marcos; Martínez-Baz, Iván; Leroux-Roels, Isabel; Borg, Maria-Louise; Oroszi, Beatrix; Fitzgerald, Margaret; Dürrwald, Ralf; Jancoriene, Ligita; Machado, Ausenda; Petrović, Goranka; Lazar, Mihaela; Součková, Lenka; Bacci, Sabrina; Howard, Jennifer; Verdasca, Nuno; Basile, Luca; Castilla, Jesús; Ternest, Silke; Džiugytė, Aušra; Túri, Gergő; Duffy, Roisin; Hackmann, Carolin; Kuliese, Monika; Gomez, Verónica; Makarić, Zvjezdana Lovrić; Marin, Alexandru; Husa, Petr; Nicolay, Nathalie; Rose, Angela M. C.; VEBIS SARI VE network teamWe estimated the effectiveness of the adapted monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 hospitalisation during the BA.2.86/JN.1 lineage-predominant period using a multicentre test-negative case-control study in Europe. We included older adults (≥ 65 years) hospitalised with severe acute respiratory infection from November 2023 to May 2024. Vaccine effectiveness was 46% at 14-59 days and 34% at 60-119 days, with no effect thereafter. The XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines conferred protection against BA.2.86 lineage hospitalisation in the first 4 months post-vaccination.
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »