An Overview of Monkeypox Virus Detection in Different Clinical Samples and Analysis of Temporal Viral Load Dynamics

Cordeiro, Rita; Pelerito, Ana; de Carvalho, Isabel Lopes; Lopo, Sílvia; Neves, Raquel; Rocha, Raquel; Palminha, Paula; Verdasca, Nuno; Palhinhas, Cláudia; Borrego, Maria José; Manita, Carla; Ferreira, Idalina; Bettencourt, Célia; Vieira, Patrícia; Silva, Sónia; Água-Doce, Ivone; Roque, Carla; Cordeiro, Dora; Brondani, Greice; Santos, João Almeida; Martins, Susana; Rodrigues, Irene; Ribeiro, Carlos; Núncio, Maria Sofia; Gomes, João Paulo; Batista, Fernando da Conceição

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/10442

Use this identifier to reference this record.

Name:	Description:	Size:	Format:
Journal of Medical Virology - 2024 - Cordeiro - An Overview of Monkeypox Virus Detection in Different Clinical Samples and.pdf		2.22 MB	Adobe PDF	Download

Send Feedback

Authors

Cordeiro, Rita

Pelerito, Ana

de Carvalho, Isabel Lopes

Abstract(s)

Mpox is a zoonotic disease caused by the Monkeypox virus (MPXV), and since May 2022, tens of thousands of cases have been reported in non-endemic countries. We aimed to evaluate the suitability of different sample types for mpox diagnostic and assess the temporal dynamics of viral load. We evaluated 1914 samples from 953 laboratory-confirmed cases. The positivity rate was higher for lesion (91.3%) and rectal swabs (86.1%) when compared with oropharyngeal swabs (69.5%) and urines (41.2%), indicating higher viral loads for the former. Supporting this, lesion and rectal swabs showed lower median PCR C values (C = 23 and C = 24), compared to oropharyngeal swabs and urines (C = 31). Stable MPXV loads were observed in swabs from lesions up to 30 days after symptoms onset, contrasting with a considerable decrease in viral load in rectal and oropharyngeal swabs. Overall, these results point to lesion swabs as the most suitable samples for detecting MPXV in the 2022-2023 multicountry outbreak and show comparable accuracy to rectal swabs up to 8 days after symptoms onset. These findings, together with the observation that about 5% of patients were diagnosed through oropharyngeal swabs while having negative lesions, suggest that multisite testing should be performed to increase diagnostic sensitivity.