Repository logo
 
Loading...
Profile Picture
Person

do Carmo Cerdeira Antunes, Liliana

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Métodos epidemiológicos e estatísticos numa emergência de Saúde Pública
    Publication . Nunes, Baltazar; Caetano, Constantino; Antunes, Liliana; Torres, Ana Rita; Silva, Susana; Rodrigues, Ana Paula; Kislaya, Irina; Machado, Ausenda; Garcia, Ana Cristina; Gómez, Verónica; Namorado, Sónia; Patrício, Paula; Ribeiro, Maria Luísa; Pereira, João; Matias Dias, Carlos
    Sobre o papel dos método estatístico e epidemiológico na resposta à emergência COVID-19: Vigilância epidemiológica; Estudos epidemiológicos especiais; Modelação matemática.
  • Local problem solving in the Portuguese health examination survey: a mixed method study
    Publication . Lyshol, Heidi; Gil, Ana Paula; Tolonen, Hanna; Namorado, Sónia; Kislaya, Irina; Barreto, Marta; Antunes, Liliana; Gaio, Vânia; Santos, Ana João; Rodrigues, Ana Paula; Matias Dias, Carlos
    Background: Participation rates in health surveys, recognized as an important quality dimension, have been declining over the years, which may affect representativeness and confidence in results. The Portuguese national health examination survey INSEF (2015) achieved a participation rate of 43.9%, which is in line with participation rates from other similar health examination surveys. The objective of this article is to describe how local teams of survey personnel conducted the survey, describing strategies used to solve practical survey problems and to try to increase the participation rate. Methods: After a literature search, informal interviews were conducted with 14 public health officials from local health examination teams, regional and central authorities. Forty-one of the local staff members (survey personnel) also filled in a short questionnaire anonymously. The interviews and self-administered questionnaires were analysed using mixed methods, informed by thematic analysis. Results: The local teams believed that the detailed manual, described as a “cookbook for making a health examination survey”, made it possible to maintain high scientific standards while allowing for improvising solutions to problems in the local context. The quality of the manual, supported by a series of training workshops with the central research and support team, gave the teams the confidence and knowledge to implement local solutions. Motivation and cohesion within the local teams were among the goals of the training process. Local teams felt empowered by being given large responsibilities and worked hard to incite people to attend the examination through a close and persuasive approach. Local teams praised their INSA contacts for being available for assistance throughout the survey, and said they were inspired to try harder to reach participants to please their contacts for interpersonal reasons. Conclusions: The theory of organizational improvisation or bricolage, which means using limited resources to solve problems, was useful to discuss and understand what took place during INSEF. A detailed manual covering standard procedures, continuous monitoring of the data collection and face-to-face workshops, including role-play, were vital to assure high scientific standards and high participation rates in this health examination survey. Close contacts between the central team and local focal points in all regions and all survey sites were key to accommodating unexpected challenges and innovative solutions.
  • Statistics in Times of Pandemics: the Role of Statistical and Epidemiological Methods during the COVID-19 Emergency. One Day Meeting on Statistics and Applied Probability
    Publication . Nunes, Baltazar; Caetano, Constantino; Antunes, Liliana; Torres, Ana Rita; Silva, Susana; Rodrigues, Ana Paula; Kislaya, Irina; Machado, Ausenda; Garcia, Ana Cristina; Gómez, Verónica; Namorado, Sónia; Patrício, Paula; Ribeiro, Maria Luísa; Pereira, João; Matias Dias, Carlos
    About the Role of Statistical and Epidemiological Methods during the COVID-19 Emergency.
  • Effectiveness of the adapted bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalisation in individuals aged ≥ 60 years during the Omicron XBB lineage-predominant period: VEBIS SARI VE network, Europe, February to August, 2023
    Publication . Antunes, Liliana; Mazagatos, Clara; Martínez-Baz, Iván; Gómez, Verónica; Borg, Maria-Louise; Petrović, Goranka; Duffy, Róisín; Dufrasne, François E; Dürrwald, Ralf; Lazar, Mihaela; Jancoriene, Ligita; Oroszi, Beatrix; Husa, Petr; Howard, Jennifer; Melo, Aryse; Pozo, Francisco; Pérez-Gimeno, Gloria; Castilla, Jesús; Machado, Ausenda; Džiugytė, Aušra; Karabuva, Svjetlana; Fitzgerald, Margaret; Fierens, Sébastien; Tolksdorf, Kristin; Popovici, Silvia-Odette; Mickienė, Auksė; Túri, Gergő; Součková, Lenka; Nicolay, Nathalie; Rose, Angela MC; on behalf of the European Hospital Vaccine Effectiveness Group
    The European Medicines Agency (EMA) authorised four adapted bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines for use against COVID-19 in September/October 2022: Comirnaty (BNT162b2; Pfizer-BioNTech) and Spikevax (mRNA-1273; Moderna) Original/Omicron BA.1 and Original/Omicron BA.4–5 [1]. During autumn 2022, all European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries had vaccination campaigns in place to administer a booster dose, with several countries using the adapted bivalent vaccines [2]. The Omicron-descendent XBB lineage and XBB.1.5 sub-lineage became variants of interest in March 2023 [3]. We estimated the effectiveness of the COVID-19 bivalent vaccines against hospitalisation with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients aged ≥ 60 years with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) during the XBB lineage-predominant period.
  • Early COVID‐19 XBB.1.5 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Hospitalisation Among Adults Targeted for Vaccination, VEBIS Hospital Network, Europe, October 2023–January 2024
    Publication . Antunes, Liliana; Mazagatos, Clara; Martínez‐Baz, Iván; Naesens, Reinout; Borg, Maria‐Louise; Petrović, Goranka; Fatukasi, Terra; Jancoriene, Ligita; Machado, Ausenda; Oroszi, Beatrix; Husa, Petr; Lazar, Mihaela; Dürrwald, Ralf; Howard, Jennifer; Melo, Aryse; Pérez‐Gimeno, Gloria; Castilla, Jesús; Bernaert, Eva; Džiugytė, Aušra; Makarić, Zvjezdana Lovrić; Fitzgerald, Margaret; Mickienė, Auksė; Gómez, Verónica; Túri, Gergő; Součková, Lenka; Marin, Alexandru; Tolksdorf, Kristin; Nicolay, Nathalie; Rose, Angela M.C.; European Hospital Vaccine Effectiveness Group
    We conducted a multicentre test-negative case–control study covering the period from October 2023 to January 2024 among adult patients aged ≥18 years hospitalised with severe acute respiratory infection in Europe. We provide early estimates of the effectiveness of the newly adapted XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 hospitalisation. Vaccine effectiveness was 49% overall, ranging between 69% at 14–29days and 40% at 60–105days post vaccination. The adapted XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines conferred protection against COVID-19 hospitalisation in the first 3.5months post vaccination, with VE>70% in older adults (≥65 years) up to 1month post vaccination.