| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Developing tailor-made fortified farmed fish is a promising solution to overcome nutritional deficiencies and
increase consumer confidence in these products. This study evaluated the supplementation of three fortified diets
with I-rich seaweed and selenised-yeast on essential and toxic elements levels in gilthead seabream (Sparus
aurata) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Fortified diets resulted in increased I, Se and Fe in fish muscle.
Biofortified seabream and carp revealed lower Cu and Br. The reduction of fishmeal and fish oil in fortified diets
resulted in lower Hg and Cd in seabream muscle. Contrarily, fortified diets increased As and Hg in carp fillets.
The consumption of 150 g of fortified seabream enabled a significantly higher contribution to the daily recommended
intake (DRI) of I (10%) and Se (76%) than non-fortified fish, whereas fortified carp fulfilled 23% of I
DRI and 91% of Se DRI. Moreover, the exposure to Pb decreased with the consumption of biofortified seabream
(23–82% BMDL01) and carp (26–92% BMDL01). These results support the strategy of developing eco-innovative
biofortified farmed fish using sustainable, natural, safe and high-quality ingredients in feeds, to enable consumers
to overcome nutritional deficiencies without significantly increased feed costs.
Highlights: Farmed fish biofortification was successfully achieved through I and Se enriched diets from natural and sustainable sources; Biofortified fish fillets yielded a lower exposure to toxic elements, including Hg, Cd and Pb; Iodine fortification was more efficient in common carp, while Se biofortification was more efficient in gilthead seabream; Consumption of biofortified fish provides higher contribution to the DRI of I and Se, without compromising consumer safety.
Highlights: Farmed fish biofortification was successfully achieved through I and Se enriched diets from natural and sustainable sources; Biofortified fish fillets yielded a lower exposure to toxic elements, including Hg, Cd and Pb; Iodine fortification was more efficient in common carp, while Se biofortification was more efficient in gilthead seabream; Consumption of biofortified fish provides higher contribution to the DRI of I and Se, without compromising consumer safety.
Description
Keywords
Biofortification Sugar Kelp Selenized Yeast Seabream Essential and Toxic Elements Carp Nutrição Aplicada
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Jun;140:111330. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111330. Epub 2020 Apr 14
Publisher
Elsevier/ Pergamon
