| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1013.43 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Maternal pregestational diabetes is a well-known risk factor for congenital anomalies. This
study analyses the spectrum of congenital anomalies associated with maternal diabetes using data from a
large European database for the population-based surveillance of congenital anomalies. METHODS: Data
from 18 population-based EUROCAT registries of congenital anomalies in 1990-2005. All malformed cases
occurring to mothers with pregestational diabetes (diabetes cases) were compared to all malformed cases in
the same registry areas to mothers without diabetes (non-diabetes cases). RESULTS: There were 669 diabetes
cases and 92,976 non diabetes cases. Odds ratios in diabetes pregnancies relative to non-diabetes pregnancies
comparing each EUROCAT subgroup to all other non-chromosomal anomalies combined showed significantly
increased odds ratios for neural tube defects (anencephaly and encephalocele, but not spina bifida)
and several subgroups of congenital heart defects. Other subgroups with significantly increased odds ratios
were anotia, omphalocele and bilateral renal agenesis. Frequency of hip dislocation was significantly lower
among diabetes (odds ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.05–0.39) than non-diabetes cases. Multiple congenital anomalies
were present in 13.6 % of diabetes cases and 6.1 % of non-diabetes cases. The odds ratio for caudal regression
sequence was very high (26.40, 95% CI 8.98–77.64), but only 17% of all caudal regression cases resulted
from a pregnancy with pregestational diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of congenital anomalies
in pregnancies with pregestational diabetes is related to specific non-chromosomal congenital anomalies and
multiple congenital anomalies and not a general increased risk.
Description
Keywords
Pregestational Diabetes Congenital Anomalies Population Based Livebirths Europe Estados de Saúde e de Doença
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012 Mar;94(3):134-40. doi: 10.1002/bdra.22886. Epub 2012 Feb 28
