Browsing by Issue Date, starting with "2023-02-23"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Biocompatibility evaluation of CeO2 nanoparticles to be employed as nanodrugs in brain cancer nanomedicinePublication . Fernández-Bertólez, Natália; Touzani, Assia; Martínez, L.; Reis, Ana Teresa; Fraga, Sónia; Teixeira, João Paulo; Costa, Carla; Pásaro, Eduardo; Laffon, Blanca; Valdiglesias, VanessaCerium dioxide nanoparticles (CeO2NP) have recently gained attention for their unique structure-dependent properties, antioxidant enzyme-like behaviour, ROS scavenging activity and great potential for biomedical applications. In addition to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity, CeO2NP are also known to exhibit anticancer potential, providing an attractive opportunity for use in cancer therapy, as a pharmacological agent and/or in drug/gene delivery systems [1]. Therefore, the main objective of this STSM was to evaluate the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on human glioblastoma A172 cells exposed for 3, 24 and 48h to CeO2NP (1- 100µg/ml), to verify their safety to be used as possible nanomedicines for brain cancer treatment, specifically glioblastoma [2]. In addition, cell-specific differences in nanoceria effect were evaluated by comparing the results obtained with those observed in human neuronal SH-SY5Y cells exposed under the same experimental conditions. After carrying out the physicochemical characterization and analysing the cellular uptake of the CeO2NP, potential alterations in cell viability (MTT assay) and induction of DNA double-strand breaks (γH2AX assay) caused by the exposure were determined. The possible NP interference with assay methodologies was previously addressed and eliminated when necessary. Results obtained showed that, although there was a significant dose- and time-dependent internalization of NP by both cell types, nanoceria induced scarce cytotoxicity or genotoxicity in both cell lines, being restricted to the highest doses and longer exposure time tested. In general, data obtained suggest a high biocompatibility of CeO2NP under the tested conditions, except for glioblastoma cells exposed for 48h from 25 to 100µg/ml. These results provide a better understanding of the CeO2NP interaction with nervous system cells and their possible adverse effects. However, further studies are necessary to delve into the differential behaviour of these NP depending on the nervous cell type tested.
- Effect of Quorum Sensing Molecule Farnesol on Mixed Biofilms of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureusPublication . Gaálová-Radochová, Barbora; Kendra, Samuel; Jordao, Luisa; Kursawe, Laura; Kikhney, Judith; Moter, Annette; Bujdáková, HelenaThe natural bioactive molecule farnesol (FAR) is widely studied mainly for its antibiofilm and antimicrobial properties. In addition, it increases the effectiveness of some antimicrobial substances, which makes it interesting for the development of combined therapy. In the present work, the effect of FAR either alone or in combination with oxacillin (OXA) on mixed biofilms formed by clinically relevant pathogens, Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus, was studied. S. aureus isolates used for biofilm formation originated from blood cultures and central venous catheters (CVC) were characterized in terms of antimicrobial resistance. The minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC50) for FAR of 48 h mixed biofilms formed by the C. albicans and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) was determined to be 125 M, and for the mixed biofilms with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was determined to be 250 M. Treatment of mixed biofilms with OXA (2 mg/mL) showed 4% inhibition; however, the combination of OXA (2 mg/mL) and FAR (300 M) resulted in 80% inhibition of biofilms. In addition, planktonic cells of S. aureus exhibited an increased susceptibility to OXA, cefoxitin and kanamycin in the presence of FAR (150 and 300 M). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs confirmed patchy biofilm and lack of candidal hyphae in the samples treated with FAR and FAR/OXA in comparison to control and mixed biofilms treated only with OXA. Intriguingly, in a pilot experiment using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), considerable differences in activity (as indicated by ribosome content) of staphylococcal cells were detected. While the activity rate of the staphylococci in mixed biofilms treated with FAR was high, no FISH-positive signal for staphylococcal cells was found in the biofilm treated with FAR/OXA.
