Browsing by Issue Date, starting with "2022-08-18"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Disease similarity network analysis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and comorbid brain disordersPublication . Vilela, Joana; Martiniano, Hugo; Marques, Ana Rita; Santos, João Xavier; Rasga, Célia; Oliveira, Guiomar; Vicente, Astrid MouraAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with heterogeneous clinical presentation, variable severity, and multiple comorbidities. A complex underlying genetic architecture matches the clinical heterogeneity, and evidence indicates that several co-occurring brain disorders share a genetic component with ASD. In this study, we established a genetic similarity disease network approach to explore the shared genetics between ASD and frequent comorbid brain diseases (and subtypes), namely Intellectual Disability, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Epilepsy, as well as other rarely co-occurring neuropsychiatric conditions in the Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disease spectrum. Using sets of disease-associated genes curated by the DisGeNET database, disease genetic similarity was estimated from the Jaccard coefficient between disease pairs, and the Leiden detection algorithm was used to identify network disease communities and define shared biological pathways. We identified a heterogeneous brain disease community that is genetically more similar to ASD, and that includes Epilepsy, Bipolar Disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder combined type, and some disorders in the Schizophrenia Spectrum. To identify loss-of-function rare de novo variants within shared genes underlying the disease communities, we analyzed a large ASD whole-genome sequencing dataset, showing that ASD shares genes with multiple brain disorders from other, less genetically similar, communities. Some genes (e.g., SHANK3, ASH1L, SCN2A, CHD2, and MECP2) were previously implicated in ASD and these disorders. This approach enabled further clarification of genetic sharing between ASD and brain disorders, with a finer granularity in disease classification and multi-level evidence from DisGeNET. Understanding genetic sharing across disorders has important implications for disease nosology, pathophysiology, and personalized treatment.
- HBM4EU Chromates Study - Genotoxicity and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Workers Exposed to Hexavalent ChromiumPublication . Tavares, Ana; Aimonen, Kukka; Ndaw, Sophie; Fučić, Aleksandra; Catalán, Julia; Duca, Radu Corneliu; Godderis, Lode; Gomes, Bruno C.; Janasik, Beata; Ladeira, Carina; Louro, Henriqueta; Namorado, Sónia; Nieuwenhuyse, An Van; Norppa, Hannu; Scheepers, Paul; Ventura, Célia; Verdonck, Jelle; Viegas, Susana; Wasowicz, Wojciech; Santonen, Tiina; Silva, M.J.; on behalf of the HBM4EU Chromates Study TeamA study was conducted within the European Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU) to characterize occupational exposure to Cr(VI). Herein we present the results of biomarkers of genotoxicity and oxidative stress, including micronucleus analysis in lymphocytes and reticulocytes, the comet assay in whole blood, and malondialdehyde and 8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine in urine. Workers from several Cr(VI)-related industrial activities and controls from industrial (within company) and non-industrial (outwith company) environments were included. The significantly increased genotoxicity (p = 0.03 for MN in lymphocytes and reticulocytes; p < 0.001 for comet assay data) and oxidative stress levels (p = 0.007 and p < 0.001 for MDA and 8-OHdG levels in pre-shift urine samples, respectively) that were detected in the exposed workers over the outwith company controls suggest that Cr(VI) exposure might still represent a health risk, particularly, for chrome painters and electrolytic bath platers, despite the low Cr exposure. The within-company controls displayed DNA and chromosomal damage levels that were comparable to those of the exposed group, highlighting the relevance of considering all industry workers as potentially exposed. The use of effect biomarkers proved their capacity to detect the early biological effects from low Cr(VI) exposure, and to contribute to identifying subgroups that are at higher risk. Overall, this study reinforces the need for further re-evaluation of the occupational exposure limit and better application of protection measures. However, it also raised some additional questions and unexplained inconsistencies that need follow-up studies to be clarified.