Percorrer por data de Publicação, começado por "2017-10-03"
A mostrar 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opções de ordenação
- Comparing the genotoxicity of a multiwalled carbon nanotube and crocidolite towards the evaluation of its potential impact on the workers’ healthPublication . Ventura, Célia; Sousa Uva, António; Silva, Maria JoãoBackground: Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) are one of the most promising and widespread class of manufactured nanomaterials, with several industrial and biomedical applications. However, their unique physicochemical properties may have detrimental effects on human health upon unintentional exposure by inhalation. Although there is still no sufficient epidemiological and toxicological data on most MWCNT, several professional and scientific organizations adopted a precautionary principle and considered MWCNT as an occupational hazard. In vitro toxicological studies can contribute to fulfil the gaps on the knowledge about their potential health adverse effects and to identify biomarkers for human biomonitoring, particularly in the workplace. Aim- This study was aimed at characterizing the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of NRCWE-006, a high aspect-ratio rigid MWCNT, comparatively to crocidolite, a well-known tumorigenic asbestos fiber causing mesothelioma, using a co-culture of alveolar epithelial cells (A549) and monocyte-derived macrophages (THP-1). Methods – The MTT, the comet and the micronucleus assays were performed on a co-culture of A549 and differentiated THP-1 cells following exposure to a concentration- range of NRCWE-006 or crocidolite. Results- Both NRCWE-006 and crocidolite revealed cytotoxicity by the MTT assay. NRCWE-006 did not induce a detectable level of DNA breaks under the comet assay conditions tested, while a significant increase in the micronucleus frequency was detected at 6.25 and 12.5 µg/cm2. In contrast, crocidolite revealed a clear dose-dependent increase in the level of DNA strand breaks (comet assay) and induced a significant increase in the micronucleus frequency at the highest concentrations tested (10 and 20 µg/cm2). Discussion and Conclusions – Our results suggest that NRCWE-006 is less cytotoxic than crocidolite to alveolar cells grown in co-culture with monocyte-derived macrophages. As expected, crocidolite was clearly genotoxic, given that it was able to induce DNA and chromosome damage, probably due to its known potential of ROS production. On the other hand, even though NRCWE-006 did not cause DNA damage, it demonstrated aneugenic/clastogenic effects at the two lowest concentrations, which are closer to the ones that may represent a concern in terms of occupational exposure.
- Evalution of a challenge assay as na effect biomarker in environmental or occupational biomonitoring studiesPublication . Louro, Henriqueta; Monteiro-Gil, Octávia; Penque, Deborah; Silva, Maria JoãoBackground: Human long-term exposure to environmental or occupational stressors may produce adverse effects, e.g., genotoxic effects that underlie the onset of diseases, among which cancer is the most severe. Besides the instability that a wide variety of genotoxic and carcinogenic agents directly exert on the cell genome, also indirect effects, e.g., interference with the DNA repair capacity deserve to be studied. Such effects have been described for heavy metals, low doses of ionising radiation or complex mixtures, among others. Aim: This work aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the ex vivo challenge assay as a functional biomarker of early biological effects, based on data previously obtained in molecular epidemiology studies. Methods: The first study (S1) comprised a group of individuals with environmental exposure to ionising radiation and heavy metals (IR Group) and a non-exposed group (NIR Group), whereas the second study (S2) included individuals occupationally exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS Group) and the respective control group (NETS Group). In S1, whole blood samples were subjected to 2Gy of ionising radiation before culture set up for translocation analysis through FISH. Blood samples from S2 participants were exposed to an alkylating agent (EMS) and then processed for the comet assay; the level of DNA damage was quantified by the percentage of DNA in tail. The level of chromosome or DNA damage measured after the ex vivo challenge with the genotoxic agents was compared to the basal level obtained for the same individuals in S1 and S2, respectively. Results: The results from both studies showed that peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) exposure to a medium/high dose of a genotoxicant (ionising radiation or EMS), followed by an assessment of chromosome or DNA damage, respectively, allowed to distinguish exposed and control groups. The distinct response consisted of a lower frequency of ionising radiation-induced translocations in the IR comparatively to the NIR group (S1) or a lower level of EMS-induced DNA breaks in the ETS comparatively to the NETS Group (S2). Discussion and Conclusions: The results from both studies agreed in that the use of an ex vivo challenge of PBLs with a genotoxicant allowed the detection of a differential response between the exposed and non-exposed groups. Interestingly, PBLs from exposed individuals were less affected by the ex vivo exposure to a genotoxicant suggesting an adaptive response instead of a reduced DNA repair capacity. These findings are expected to contribute to the development of new biomarkers of early biological effects for human biomonitoring studies.