Browsing by Author "Corsini, Emanuela"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- A critical review to identify data gaps and improve risk assessment of bisphenol A alternatives for human healthPublication . Mhaouty-Kodja, Sakina; Zalko, Daniel; Tait, Sabrina; Testai, Emanuela; Viguié, Catherine; Corsini, Emanuela; Grova, Nathalie; Buratti, Franca Maria; Cabaton, Nicolas J.; Coppola, Lucia; De la Vieja, Antonio; Dusinska, Maria; El Yamani, Naouale; Galbiati, Valentina; Iglesias-Hernández, Patricia; Kohl, Yvonne; Maddalon, Ambra; Marcon, Francesca; Naulé, Lydie; Rundén-Pran, Elise; Salani, Francesca; Santori, Nicoletta; Torres-Ruiz, Mónica; Turner, Jonathan D.; Adamovsky, Ondrej; Aiello-Holden, Kiara; Dirven, Hubert; Louro, Henriqueta; Silva, Maria JoãoBisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic chemical widely used in the production of polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins, has been associated with a variety of adverse effects in humans including metabolic, immunological, reproductive, and neurodevelopmental effects, raising concern about its health impact. In the EU, it has been classified as toxic to reproduction and as an endocrine disruptor and was thus included in the candidate list of substances of very high concern (SVHC). On this basis, its use has been banned or restricted in some products. As a consequence, industries turned to bisphenol alternatives, such as bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF), which are now found in various consumer products, as well as in human matrices at a global scale. However, due to their toxicity, these two bisphenols are in the process of being regulated. Other BPA alternatives, whose potential toxicity remains largely unknown due to a knowledge gap, have also started to be used in manufacturing processes. The gradual restriction of the use of BPA underscores the importance of understanding the potential risks associated with its alternatives to avoid regrettable substitutions. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the potential hazards related to BPA alternatives prioritized by European Regulatory Agencies based on their regulatory relevance and selected to be studied under the European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC): BPE, BPAP, BPP, BPZ, BPS-MAE, and TCBPA. The focus is on data related to toxicokinetic, endocrine disruption, immunotoxicity, developmental neurotoxicity, and genotoxicity/carcinogenicity, which were considered the most relevant endpoints to assess the hazard related to those substances. The goal here is to identify the data gaps in BPA alternatives toxicology and hence formulate the future directions that will be taken in the frame of the PARC project, which seeks also to enhance chemical risk assessment methodologies using new approach methodologies (NAMs).
- Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of silver (E 174) as a food additive (EFSA‐Q‐2023‐00169)Publication . EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF); Andreassen, Monica; Aquilina, Gabriele; Bastos, Maria Lourdes; Boon, Polly; Castle, Laurence; Fallico, Biagio; FitzGerald, Reginald; Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose; Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina; Gundert‐Remy, Ursula; Gürtler, Rainer; Kurek, Marcin Andrzej; Louro, Henriqueta; Morales, Patricia; Passamonti, Sabina; Oomen, Agnes; Corsini, Emanuela; Wright, Matthew; Furst, Peter; Gaffet, Eric; Loeschner, Katrin; Mast, Jan; Undas, Anna; Mech, Agnieszka; Rincon, Ana Maria; Ruggeri, Laura; Smeraldi, CamillaSilver (E 174) is a food colour that was re‐evaluated by the EFSA ANS Panel (2016). The ANS Panel concluded that the information available then, was insufficient to assess the safety of silver as food additive. The major issues included limited characterisation of silver E 174 (e.g. quantity of nanoparticles) and release of ionic silver. Following a European Commission call for further data to fill the data gap, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of silver (E 174). One interested business operator (IBO) submitted limited data on particle size distribution and morphology, two genotoxicity studies and one subchronic study. The Panel concluded that the technical data submitted on physicochemical characterisation of all types of silver used as food additive E 174 were not adequate. As a result, the Panel was unable to propose changes to the EU specifications of E174 on particle size and morphology. As the additional information requested was not provided, the assessment was based solely on the submitted data. Nonetheless, given the data provided and silver insolubility in water, the Panel concluded that E174 requires risk assessment at the nanoscale following the EFSA Guidance on Risk assessment of nanomaterials to be applied in the food and feed chain, to complement the conventional risk assessment. The Panel considered that the genotoxicity data and sub‐chronic toxicity data were inadequate. Consequently, the Panel could not conclude on the safety of the food additive silver E 174.
- Hazard assessment of bisphenol A alternatives to close data gaps of concern for human health and improve their risk assessmentPublication . Aiello Holden, Kiara; Tait, Sabrina; Viguié, Catherine; Mhaouty-Kodja, Sakina; Corsini, Emanuela; Silva, Maria João; Zalko, Daniel; Testai, Emanuela; Louro, Henriqueta; Dirven, HubertWHY? With the upcoming restrictions on BPA, BPA alternatives’ tonnages and frequencies of use are expected to severely increase in the coming years. Therefore, this project aims to fill the identified data gaps, providing a complete data set for at least four relevant BPA alternatives identified in an ad hoc Workshop together with ECHA and EFSA. We will fill the knowledge gaps on human health on five toxicological endpoints and by the identification of molecular biomarkers we will contribute to develop methods to rapidly predict the possible effects of BPA alternatives.
- New approach methodologies to enhance human health risk assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals - a PARC (Partnership for the Assessment of Risk from Chemicals) projectPublication . Snapkow, Igor; Smith, Nicola M.; Arnesdotter, Emma; Beekmann, Karsten; Blanc, Etienne B.; Braeuning, Albert; Corsini, Emanuela; Sollner Dolenc, Marija; Duivenvoorde, Loes P.M.; Sundstøl Eriksen, Gunnar; Franko, Nina; Galbiati, Valentina; Gostner, Johanna M.; Grova, Nathalie; Gutleb, Arno C.; Hargitai, Rita; Janssen, Aafke W.F.; Krapf, Solveig A.; Lindeman, Birgitte; Lumniczky, Katalin; Maddalon, Ambra; Mollerup, Steen; Parráková, Lucia; Pierzchalski, Arkadiusz; Pieters, Raymond H.H.; Silva, Maria Joao; Solhaug, Anita; Staal, Yvonne C.M.; Straumfors, Anne; Szatmári, Tünde; Turner, Jonathan D.; Vandebriel, Rob J.; Zenclussen, Ana Claudia; Barouki, RobertAs a complex system governing and interconnecting numerous functions within the human body, the immune system is unsurprisingly susceptible to the impact of toxic chemicals. Toxicants can influence the immune system through a multitude of mechanisms, resulting in immunosuppression, hypersensitivity, increased risk of autoimmune diseases and cancer development. At present, the regulatory assessment of the immunotoxicity of chemicals relies heavily on rodent models and a limited number of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guidelines, which only capture a fraction of potential toxic properties. Due to this limitation, various authorities, including the World Health Organization and the European Food Safety Authority have highlighted the need for the development of novel approaches without the use of animals for immunotoxicity testing of chemicals. In this paper, we present a concise overview of ongoing efforts dedicated to developing and standardizing methodologies for a comprehensive characterization of the immunotoxic effects of chemicals, which are performed under the EU-funded Partnership for the Assessment of Risk from Chemicals (PARC).
- SCCS Opinion on Biphenyl-2-ol and Sodium 2-biphenylolate used in cosmetic products (CAS/EC No. 90-43-7/201-993-5 and 132-27-4/205-055-6)– SCCS/1669/24Publication . Bernauer, Ulrike; Bodin, Laurent; Chaudhry, Qasim; Coenraads, Pieter Jan; Ezendam, Janine; Gaffet, Eric; Galli, Corrado L.; Panteri, Eirini; Rogiers, Vera; Rousselle, Christophe; Stepnik, Maciej; Vanhaecke, Tamara; Wijnhoven, Susan; Benfenati, Emilio; Corsini, Emanuela; Koutsodimou, Aglaia; Aglaia Koutsodimou; Louro, Henriqueta; Uter, Wolfgang; von Goetz, NatalieHighlights: -o-Phenylphenol (OPP) is safe when used as preservative up to a maximum concentration of 0.2 % in rinse-off cosmetic products; - o-Phenylphenol (OPP) is safe when used as preservative up to a maximum concentration of 0.15 % in leave-on cosmetic products; - Sodium o-Phenylphenate is safe when used as preservative up to a maximum concentration of 0.2 % in rinse-off cosmetic products; - Sodium o-Phenylphenate is safe when used as preservative up to a maximum concentration of 0.15 % in leave-on cosmetic products; - OPP and Sodium o-Phenylphenate, when used together, should not exceed the maximum concentration 0.15 % in leave-on cosmetic products; - OPP and Sodium o-Phenylphenate, when used together, should not exceed the maximum concentration 0.2 % in rinse-off cosmetic products; - Since this safety dossier related to dermally applied products only, the SCCS did not consider oral and inhalation routes; - This assessment did not cover the safety of O-Phenylphenol and Sodium o-Phenylphenate for the environment.
- Scientific Opinion on benzophenone – 4 (CAS No. 4065-45-6, EC No. 223-772-2) used in cosmetics products – SCCS/1660/23Publication . Van Haecke, Tamara; Rogiers, Vera; Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety - SCCS; Bernauer, Ulrike; Bodin, Laurent; Chaudhry, Qasim; Coenraads, Pieter Jan; Ezendam, Janine; Gaffet, Eric; Galli, Corrado L.; Panteri, Eirini; Rogiers, Vera; Rousselle, Christophe; Stepnik, Maciej; Vanhaecke, Tamara; Wijnhoven, Susan; Benfenati, Emilio; Cabaton, Nicolas; Corsini, Emanuela; Koutsodimou, Aglaia; Louro, Henriqueta; Uter, Wolfgang; von Goetz, NatalieHighlights: -BZP-4 is safe when used as UV filter up to a max. conc. of 5 % in sunscreen, all leave-on products (tot. dermal aggregate); -BZP-4 is safe when used as UV filter up to a max. conc. of 5 % in sunscreen, all rinse-off products (tot. dermal aggregate); -Same for lipstick, sunscreen propellant and pump spray (separately or in combination based on determ. aggregated exposure); -BZP-4 use as stabiliser when the product is exposed to light should remain within the conc. of. 5 %, incl. UV-filter use; -This assessment did not cover the safety of Benzophenone-4 for the environment.