Repository logo
 
Publication

Evaluation of the analytical measurement uncertainty by two methods in food vitamin A and E determination

dc.contributor.authorDias, M. Graça
dc.contributor.authorVasco, Elsa
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Mariana
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-10T18:35:58Z
dc.date.available2012-02-10T18:35:58Z
dc.date.issued2011-09
dc.description.abstractRationale. ISO 17025 prescribes the estimation of the measurement uncertainty and specifies requirements concerning this estimation and how it should be reported. Besides,for a consistent interpretation of an analytical method result it is necessary to evaluate the confidence that can be placed in it. This can be provided by the quantification of its accuracy (trueness and precision) in the form of a measurement uncertainty estimate. Objective. To compare two approaches to estimate the analytical measurement uncertainty in the HPLC analysis of vitamins A (all-trans-retinol and 13-cis-retinol) and E ( -tocopherol) in infant milk powder. Materials and methods. The normal phase HPLC analytical method was based on EN 12822 e 12823-1. Identification was carried out based on retention time and quantitative determination by external standard method. Analytical measurement uncertainty was laboratory estimated based on method in-house validation data (evaluation of calibration curve parameters, precision, reference material analysis, detection and quantification limits) and laboratory performance results in proficiency tests (BIPEA and FAPAS), for infant milk powder. Results. Combined relative standard uncertainty obtained from laboratory validation data was 0.22 for vitamin A infant milk powder content of 100-500 μg/100 g, and 0.080 for vitamin E infant milk powder content of 15 mg/100 g. Estimation based on proficiency tests was 0.17 and 0.14, respectively for vitamin A and E. Conclusions. Results from the analytical measurement uncertainty estimation by the two methods were in good agreement for vitamin A although for vitamin E the result obtained from the intraboratory data was lower than from the interlaboratory data. According to the obtained results to give a correct impression of accuracy with which these constituent levels can be known in samples similar to the analysed, results should present at maximum two significant figures.por
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/493
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherInstituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, IPpor
dc.subjectVitamin Apor
dc.subjectUncertainty Evaluationpor
dc.subjectVitamin Epor
dc.subjectHPLCpor
dc.subjectFoodpor
dc.subjectComposição dos Alimentospor
dc.titleEvaluation of the analytical measurement uncertainty by two methods in food vitamin A and E determinationpor
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceNorwich, United Kingdompor
oaire.citation.title9th International Food Data Conference, 14-17 Setembro de 2011por
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
rcaap.typeconferenceObjectpor

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
201109_MGD_9IFDC_vitAE_Pr.pdf
Size:
118.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: