Repository logo
 
Publication

Neglected vector-borne zoonoses in Europe: Into the wild

dc.contributor.authorTomassone, L.
dc.contributor.authorBerriatua, E
dc.contributor.authorDe Sousa, R.
dc.contributor.authorDuscher, G.G.
dc.contributor.authorMihalca, A.D.
dc.contributor.authorSilaghi, C.
dc.contributor.authorSprong, H.
dc.contributor.authorZintl, A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-18T11:15:47Z
dc.date.available2019-02-18T11:15:47Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-15
dc.descriptionThis article has been prepared as a direct outcome of Working Group 5 of COST Action TD1303, EurNegVec - European Network for Neglected Vectors and Vector-Borne Infections.pt_PT
dc.description.abstractWild vertebrates are involved in the transmission cycles of numerous pathogens. Additionally, they can affect the abundance of arthropod vectors. Urbanization, landscape and climate changes, and the adaptation of vectors and wildlife to human habitats represent complex and evolving scenarios, which affect the interface of vector, wildlife and human populations, frequently with a consequent increase in zoonotic risk. While considerable attention has focused on these interrelations with regard to certain major vector-borne pathogens such as Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and tick-borne encephalitis virus, information regarding many other zoonotic pathogens is more dispersed. In this review, we discuss the possible role of wildlife in the maintenance and spread of some of these neglected zoonoses in Europe. We present case studies on the role of rodents in the cycles of Bartonella spp., of wild ungulates in the cycle of Babesia spp., and of various wildlife species in the life cycle of Leishmania infantum, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. These examples highlight the usefulness of surveillance strategies focused on neglected zoonotic agents in wildlife as a source of valuable information for health professionals, nature managers and (local) decision-makers. These benefits could be further enhanced by increased collaboration between researchers and stakeholders across Europe and a more harmonised and coordinated approach for data collection.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationVet Parasitol. 2018 Feb 15;251:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.12.018. Epub 2017 Dec 25pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.12.018. Epub 2017 Dec 25pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn0304-4017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/5839
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.12.018pt_PT
dc.subjectArthropod Vectorspt_PT
dc.subjectSurveillancept_PT
dc.subjectWildlifept_PT
dc.subjectZoonosespt_PT
dc.subjectInfecções Sistémicas e Zoonosespt_PT
dc.titleNeglected vector-borne zoonoses in Europe: Into the wildpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage26pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage17pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleVeterinary Parasitologypt_PT
oaire.citation.volume251pt_PT
rcaap.embargofctPolítica editorial da revistapt_PT
rcaap.rightsembargoedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
226 RSousa Neglected vector-borne...Vet Parasitol.pdf
Size:
372.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: