Percorrer por autor "Sousa, Paulo"
A mostrar 1 - 6 de 6
Resultados por página
Opções de ordenação
- Impact of public health initiatives on acute coronary syndrome fatality rates in PortugalPublication . Abreu, Daisy; Sousa, Paulo; Matias Dias, Carlos; Pinto, FaustoIntroduction and objective: Every year cardiovascular disease (CVD) causes 3.9 million deaths in Europe. Portugal has implemented a set of public health policies to tackle CVD mortality: a smoking ban in 2008, a salt reduction regulation in 2010 and the coronary fast-track system (FTS) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 2007. Our goal in this study was to analyze the impact of these three public health policies in reducing case-fatality rates from ACS between 2000 and 2016. Methods: The impact of these policies on monthly ACS case-fatalities was assessed by creating individual models for each of the initiatives and implementing multiple linear regression analysis, using standard methods for interrupted time series. We also implemented segmented regression analysis to test which year showed a significant difference in the case-fatality slopes. Results: Separate modeling showed that the smoking ban (beta=-0.861, p=0.050) and the FTS (beta=-1.27, p=0.003) had an immediate impact after implementation, but did not have a significant impact on ACS trends. The salt reduction regulation did not have a significant impact. For the segmented model, we found significant differences between case-fatality trends before and after 2009, with rates before 2009 showing a steeper decrease. Conclusions: The smoking ban and the FTS led to an immediate decrease in case-fatality rates; however, after 2009 no major decrease in case-fatality trends was found. Coronary heart disease constitutes an immense public health problem and it remains essential for decision-makers, public health authorities and the cardiology community to keep working to reduce ACS mortality rates.
- Improving quality and patient safety in surgical care through standardisation and harmonisation of perioperative care (SAFEST project): A research protocol for a mixed methods studyPublication . Valli, Claudia; Schäfer, Willemijn L.A.; Bañeres, Joaquim; Groene, Oliver; Arnal-Velasco, Daniel; Leite, Andreia; Suñol, Rosa; Ballester, Marta; Gibert Guilera, Marc; Wagner, Cordula; Calsbeek, Hiske; Emond, Yvette; Heideveld-Chevalking, Anita J. ; Kristensen, Kaja; Huibertina Davida van Tuyl, Lilian; Põlluste, Kaja; Weynants, Cathy; Garel, Pascal; Sousa, Paulo; Talving, Peep; Marx, David; Žaludek, Adam; Romero, Eva; Rodríguez, Anna; Orrego, CarolaIntroduction: Adverse events in health care affect 8% to 12% of patients admitted to hospitals in the European Union (EU), with surgical adverse events being the most common types reported. Aim: SAFEST project aims to enhance perioperative care quality and patient safety by establishing and implementing widely supported evidence-based perioperative patient safety practices to reduce surgical adverse events. Methods: We will conduct a mixed-methods hybrid type III implementation study supporting the development and adoption of evidence-based practices through a Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative (QILC) in co-creation with stakeholders. The project will be conducted in 10 hospitals and related healthcare facilities of 5 European countries. We will assess the level of adherence to the standardised practices, as well as surgical complications incidence, patient-reported outcomes, contextual factors influencing the implementation of the patient safety practices, and sustainability. The project will consist of six components: 1) Development of patient safety standardised practices in perioperative care; 2) Guided self-evaluation of the standardised practices; 3) Identification of priorities and actions plans; 4) Implementation of a QILC strategy; 5) Evaluation of the strategy effectiveness; 6) Patient empowerment for patient safety. Sustainability of the project will be ensured by systematic assessment of sustainability factors and business plans. Towards the end of the project, a call for participation will be launched to allow other hospitals to conduct the self-evaluation of the standardized practices. Discussion: The SAFEST project will promote patient safety standardized practices in the continuum of care for adult patients undergoing surgery. This project will result in a broad implementation of evidence-based practices for perioperative care, spanning from the care provided before hospital admission to post-operative recovery at home or outpatient facilities. Different implementation challenges will be faced in the application of the evidence-based practices, which will be mitigated by developing context-specific implementation strategies. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and will be available in an online platform.
- Moving towards a core measures set for patient safety in perioperative care: An e-Delphi consensus studyPublication . Dinis-Teixeira, J.P.; Nunes, Ana Beatriz; Leite, Andreia; Schäfer, Willemijn L.A.; Valli, Claudia; Martínez-Nicolas, Ismael; Seyfulayeva, Ayshe; Carvalho, Pedro Casaca; Rodríguez, Anna; Arnal-Velasco, Daniel; Leon, Irene; Orrego, Carola; Sousa, Paulo; on behalf of the SAFEST Consortium and the SAFEST Scientific Advisory GroupA Core Measures Set (CMS) is an agreed standardized group of measures that should be assessed and reported in research for a specific condition or clinical area. This study undertook the development of a CMS for Patient Safety through a two-round, web-based Delphi consensus approach, in the context of the "Improving quality and patient SAFEty in surgical care through STandardisation and harmonization of perioperative care in Europe" (SAFEST) project-a collaborative, patient-centered and evidence-based European Union-funded project that aims to generate action-oriented evidence in perioperative care. We developed an Initial List of Measures via an umbrella review following the deployment of an e-Delphi method with an inclusive panel of experts to prioritize measures towards a consensualized Final List of Measures. All measures were rigorously assessed for both importance and feasibility. After the two rounds of the e-Delphi consensus method we observed 13 preoperative measures (40.6% of the initial number), 24 intraoperative measures (66.7%), 25 postoperative measures (20.3%) and 23 mixed period measures (41.1%) met consensus criteria for both importance and feasibility. Higher scores were detected in importance ratings compared to feasibility across all groups of measures. Importantly, numeric averages regarding pain-related measures differed in the assessment of patients when compared to that of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs). This work not only informs future SAFEST iterations but also sets a precedent for research into valid, patient-centered, and action-oriented perioperative safety measures.
- Patient and family engagement interventions for enhancing patient safety in the perioperative journey: a scoping reviewPublication . Seyfulayeva, Ayshe; Fonte, Bianca Ferreira; Alho, Ana Margarida; Shaikh, Anum; Nunes, Ana Beatriz; Casaca, Pedro Gonçalves Carvalho; Leite, Andreia; Taha, Ayda; Dhingra-Kumar, Neelam; Sousa, PauloBackground: Surgical procedures present intricate challenges within healthcare delivery, often associated with higher risks of adverse events compared with non-surgical contexts. Patient and family engagement (PFE) throughout the perioperative journey is a possibility to enhance care quality, safety and patient-centredness. However, literature addressing PFE across the entirety of the perioperative journey remains sparse. Objective: The current scoping review aims to comprehensively map the existing interventions with PFE approach focused on improving patient safety across various types of surgical procedures throughout the perioperative journey. In addition, the review aims to understand the level and type of PFE approach adopted in this context. Eligibility criteria: Articles published in indexed peer-reviewed journals from 2003 to 2023, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish, that report on interventions with PFE approach targeting adult surgical patients, their families, caregivers, patient advocates and patient champions. The review includes articles reporting on both inpatient and ambulatory surgical patients. Methods: Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews framework, this review systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for relevant articles. Eligible interventions were categorised using PFE framework regarding the level of engagement and mapped according to the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030. Results: Out of 765 records initially identified, 32 met the eligibility criteria for data extraction and analysis, of which 40% originated from the USA, followed by the UK (18%) and Canada (12%). 47% of the interventions targeted 'multiple/all types' of procedures, 19% focused on cardiothoracic surgeries and 9% on gynaecological procedures or organ transplant. The majority of the interventions (88%) focused on PFE at the direct care level, predominantly adopting a consultation-based approach. Furthermore, 81% of eligible interventions emphasised patient information and education, 16% addressed codevelopment of policy and 3% of interventions focused on patient advocacy. Conclusion: The findings show a predominant focus on PFE interventions targeting patient safety at the direct care level, particularly in the provision of patient information and education. However, interventions at organisational and policy-making levels are notably scarce. Further investment is required to promote interventions engaging patients and families at broader organisational and policy-making levels.
- Patient and hospital characteristics that influence incidence of adverse events in acute public hospitals in Portugal: a retrospective cohort studyPublication . Sousa, Paulo; Uva, António Sousa; Serranheira, Florentino; Sousa-Uva, Mafalda; Nunes, CarlaObjective: To analyse the variation in the rate of adverse events (AEs) between acute hospitals and explore the extent to which some patients and hospital characteristics influence the differences in the rates of AEs. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Chi-square test for independence and binary logistic regression models were used to identify the potential association of some patients and hospital characteristics with AEs. Setting: Nine acute Portuguese public hospital centres. Participants: A random sample of 4250 charts, representative of around 180 000 hospital admissions in 2013, was analysed. Intervention: To measure adverse events based on chart review. Main Outcome Measure: Rate of AEs. Results: Main results: (i) AE incidence was 12.5%; (ii) 66.4% of all AEs were related to Hospital-Acquired Infection and surgical procedures; (iii) patient characteristics such as sex (female 11%; male 14.4%), age (≥65 y 16.4%; <65 y 8.5%), admission coded as elective vs. urgent (8.6% vs. 14.6%) and medical vs. surgical Diagnosis Related Group code (13.4% vs. 11.7%), all with p < 0.001, were associated with a greater occurrence of AEs. (iv) hospital characteristics such as use of reporting system (13.2% vs. 7.1%), being accredited (13.7% vs. non-accredited 11.2%), university status (15.9% vs. non-university 10.9%) and hospital size (small 12.9%; medium 9.3%; large 14.3%), all with p < 0.001, seem to be associated with a higher rate of AEs. Conclusions: We identified some patient and hospital characteristics that might influence the rate of AEs. Based on these results, more adequate solutions to improve patient safety can be defined.
- Prevalência de Cardiopatias Congénitas em Portugal em 2015: Dados do Registo Nacional de Anomalias CongénitasPublication . Melo, Isabel Saraiva de; Braz, Paula; Roquette, Rita; Sousa, Paulo; Nunes, Carla; Dias, Carlos MatiasIntrodução: A prevalência de cardiopatias congénitas em Portugal é de 8,3/1000 nascimentos; cardiopatias congénitas críticas não detectadas podem resultar em graves consequências para o feto/recém-nascido. O objectivo deste trabalho é descrever os casos de cardiopatia congénita reportados em Portugal em 2015 quanto ao diagnóstico pré-natal, patologia cardíaca e à presença de outras malformações congénitas ou anomalias cromossómicas. Estas características são comparadas nos subgrupos dos nados-vivos e de interrupção médica da gravidez. Por último, caracterizam-se os óbitos. Material e Métodos: Os dados de cardiopatias congénitas reportadas ao Registo Nacional de Anomalias Congénitas em 2015 foram analisados, e calculadas as taxas de prevalência por 1000 nascimentos, comparadas utilizando teste de independência do quiquadrado. Resultados: A prevalência de cardiopatias congénitas neste estudo foi de 5/1000, (339 nados-vivos, 20% com cardiopatias congénitas críticas). As cardiopatias mais frequentes foram as seguintes: comunicação interventricular (38%), comunicação interauricular (15%), coartação da aorta (7%), tetralogia de Fallot (7%) e estenose pulmonar (5%). Um terço dos nados-vivos teve diagnostico pré-natal de cardiopatia. Dos nados-vivos com cardiopatias congénitas críticas, 54% teve diagnostico pré-natal e 14% foi diagnosticado ao nascer. Foram identificados 84 registos de interrupção médica da gravidez; 49% apresentava cardiopatias congénitas críticas, 75% outras malformações associadas, e 40% cromossomopatias. Foram registados 15 óbitos (3,4% de mortalidade) associados a prematuridade e/ou baixo-peso ao nascer, cardiopatias congénitas críticas, outras malformações e anomalias cromossómicas. Discussão: A prevalência de cardiopatias congénitas neste estudo (5/1000 nascimentos) foi inferior ao descrito noutros estudos internacionais, não obstante uma distribuição por tipo de anomalia semelhante ao previamente reportado. Observaram-se assimetrias regionais significativas que necessitam de mais investigação. Conclusão: Este estudo é relevante para melhor conhecimento da realidade nacional e organização dos Cuidados de Saúde. É importante uma maior adesão ao Registo Nacional de Anomalias Congénitas. Palavras-chave: Cardiopatias Congénitas/epidemiologia; Portugal; Registos