Browsing by Author "Mickiene, Aukse"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- 2015/16 seasonal vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and B among elderly people in Europe: results from the I-MOVE+ projectPublication . Rondy, Marc; Larrauri, Amparo; Casado, Itziar; Alfonsi, Valeria; Pitigoi, Daniela; Launay, Odile; Syrjänen, Ritva K; Gefenaite, Giedre; Machado, Ausenda; Vučina, Vesna Višekruna; Horváth, Judith Krisztina; Paradowska-Stankiewicz, Iwona; Marbus, Sierk D; Gherasim, Alin; Díaz-González, Jorge Alberto; Rizzo, Caterina; Ivanciuc, Alina E; Galtier, Florence; Ikonen, Niina; Mickiene, Aukse; Gomez, Veronica; Kurečić Filipović, Sanja; Ferenczi, Annamária; Korcinska, Monika R; van Gageldonk-Lafeber, Rianne; I-MOVE+ hospital working group; Valenciano, MartaWe conducted a multicentre test-negative case-control study in 27 hospitals of 11 European countries to measure 2015/16 influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against hospitalised influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and B among people aged ≥ 65 years. Patients swabbed within 7 days after onset of symptoms compatible with severe acute respiratory infection were included. Information on demographics, vaccination and underlying conditions was collected. Using logistic regression, we measured IVE adjusted for potential confounders. We included 355 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 cases, 110 influenza B cases, and 1,274 controls. Adjusted IVE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was 42% (95% confidence interval (CI): 22 to 57). It was 59% (95% CI: 23 to 78), 48% (95% CI: 5 to 71), 43% (95% CI: 8 to 65) and 39% (95% CI: 7 to 60) in patients with diabetes mellitus, cancer, lung and heart disease, respectively. Adjusted IVE against influenza B was 52% (95% CI: 24 to 70). It was 62% (95% CI: 5 to 85), 60% (95% CI: 18 to 80) and 36% (95% CI: -23 to 67) in patients with diabetes mellitus, lung and heart disease, respectively. 2015/16 IVE estimates against hospitalised influenza in elderly people was moderate against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and B, including among those with diabetes mellitus, cancer, lung or heart diseases.
- Establishing a novel European hospital surveillance platform in response to a newly emerging infection lessons from the I-MOVE-COVID-19 hospital networkPublication . Ladbury, Georgia; Hamilton, Mark; Harvey, Ciaran; Mutch, Heather; McMahon, James; Mokogwu, Damilola; Sadiq, Fatima; Young, Johanna; Wallace, Lesley; Murray, Josie; Lopez‑Bernal, Jamie; Andrews, Nick; Castilla, Jesús; Casado, Itziar; Larrauri, Amparo; Mazagatos, Clara; Duval, Xavier; Bino, Silvia; Demuyser, Thomas; Machado, Ausenda; Mickiene, Aukse; Lazar, Mihaela; Stavaru, Crina; Rath, Barbara; Harrabi, Myriam; Rekacewicz, Claire; Kapisyszi, Perlat; Seyler, Lucie; Gómez, Verónica; Jancoriene, Ligita; Rose, AngelaBackground: The first signal of a new infection is often severe cases presenting at hospital. Enhanced surveillance of these cases is critical to learning more about disease epidemiology and patient outcomes, but nationallevel surveillance can lack power to draw conclusions. In response to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, the Influenza-Monitoring Vaccine Effectiveness (I-MOVE) network, founded in 2007, expanded to establish the I-MOVE-COVID-19 Consortium in February 2020. The Consortium’s surveillance objectives included using pooled data to describe clinical and epidemiological characteristics of hospitalised COVID-19 patients across Europe, in order to contribute to the knowledge base, guide patient management, and inform public health response. Methods: Eleven study sites participated in the surveillance, including 23 hospitals across six EU Member States and Albania, and hospitals nationally in England and Scotland. A standardised protocol and dataset for collection was agreed by April 2020. In England and Scotland, data were generated by linkage of routine datasets; other sites used bespoke paper or electronic questionnaires. Data were submitted, pooled and analysed quarterly. Results: Data were received regarding 84,297 COVID-19 patients hospitalised between 1 February 2020 and 31 January 2021. Three surveillance bulletins were published between September 2020 and March 2021, providing key insights into severe COVID-19 at European level. However, the unexpected, overwhelming workload at participating sites, and difficulties securing data protection and ethics permissions, delayed data submissions and presented challenges for timely analysis. Conclusions: Building on an existing network facilitated a novel European multicentre hospital surveillance system to be implemented during a pandemic; however, timeliness was nonetheless problematic. In future, processes could be streamlined e.g. by developing pre-approved template protocols with information governance and ethical approvals in place during the inter- pandemic period.
- Low 2016/17 season vaccine effectiveness against hospitalised influenza A(H3N2) among elderly: awareness warranted for 2017/18 seasonPublication . Rondy, Marc; Gherasim, Alin; Casado, Itziar; Launay, Odile; Rizzo, Caterina; Pitigoi, Daniela; Mickiene, Aukse; Marbus, Sierk D; Machado, Ausenda; Syrjänen, Ritva K; Pem-Novose, Iva; Horváth, Judith Krisztina; Larrauri, Amparo; Castilla, Jesús; Vanhems, Philippe; Alfonsi, Valeria; Ivanciuc, Alina E; Kuliese, Monika; van Gageldonk-Lafeber, Rianne; Gomez, Veronica; Ikonen, Niina; Lovric, Zvjezdana; Ferenczi, Annamária; Moren, Alain; I-MOVE+ hospital working groupIn a multicentre European hospital study we measured influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against A(H3N2) in 2016/17. Adjusted IVE was 17% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1 to 31) overall; 25% (95% CI: 2 to 43) among 65-79-year-olds and 13% (95% CI: -15 to 30) among those ≥ 80 years. As the A(H3N2) vaccine component has not changed for 2017/18, physicians and public health experts should be aware that IVE could be low where A(H3N2) viruses predominate.
- Vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3N2) and B among laboratory‐confirmed, hospitalised older adults, Europe, 2017‐18: A season of B lineage mismatched to the trivalent vaccinePublication . Rose, Angela M.C.; Kissling, Esther; Gherasim, Alin; Casado, Itziar; Bella, Antonino; Launay, Odile; Lazăr, Mihaela; Marbus, Sierk; Kuliese, Monika; Syrjänen, Ritva; Machado, Ausenda; Kurečić Filipović, Sanja; Larrauri, Amparo; Castilla, Jesús; Alfonsi, Valeria; Galtier, Florence; Ivanciuc, Alina; Meijer, Adam; Mickiene, Aukse; Ikonen, Niina; Gómez, Verónica; Lovrić Makarić, Zvjezdana; Moren, Alain; Valenciano, Marta; I-MOVE Hospital study teamBackground: Influenza A(H3N2), A(H1N1)pdm09 and B viruses co-circulated in Europe in 2017-18, predominated by influenza B. WHO-recommended, trivalent vaccine components were lineage-mismatched for B. The I-MOVE hospital network measured 2017-18 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against influenza A(H3N2) and B among hospitalised patients (≥65 years) in Europe. Methods: Following the same generic protocol for test-negative design, hospital teams in nine countries swabbed patients ≥65 years with recent onset (≤7 days) severe acute respiratory infection (SARI), collecting information on demographics, vaccination status and underlying conditions. Cases were RT-PCR positive for influenza A(H3N2) or B; controls: negative for any influenza. "Vaccinated" patients had SARI onset >14 days after vaccination. We measured pooled IVE against influenza, adjusted for study site, age, sex, onset date and chronic conditions. Results: We included 3483 patients: 376 influenza A(H3N2) and 928 B cases, and 2028 controls. Most (>99%) vaccinated patients received the B lineage-mismatched trivalent vaccine. IVE against influenza A(H3N2) was 24% (95% CI: 2 to 40); 35% (95% CI: 6 to 55) in 65- to 79-year-olds and 14% (95% CI: -22 to 39) in ≥80-year-olds. Against influenza B, IVE was 30% (95% CI: 16 to 41); 37% (95% CI: 19 to 51) in 65- to 79-year-olds and 19% (95% CI: -7 to 38) in ≥80-year-olds. Conclusions: IVE against influenza B was similar to A(H3N2) in hospitalised older adults, despite trivalent vaccine and circulating B lineage mismatch, suggesting some cross-protection. IVE was lower in those ≥80 than 65-79 years. We reinforce the importance of influenza vaccination in older adults as, even with a poorly matched vaccine, it still protects one in three to four of this population from severe influenza.