Percorrer por autor "Koscec Bjelajac, Adrijana"
A mostrar 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opções de ordenação
- An overview of work-related stress assessmentPublication . Lavreysen, Olivia; Bakusic, Jelena; Abatzi, Thalia-Anthi; Geerts, Annelien; Mateusen, Mies; Bashkin, Osnat; Koscec Bjelajac, Adrijana; Dopelt, Keren; du Prel, Jean-Baptist; Franic, Zrinka; Guseva Canu, Irina; Kiran, Sibel; Merisalu, Eda; Pereira, Cristiana Costa; Roquelaure, Yves; Godderis, LodeObjective: Work-related stress (WRS) is associated with the development of various health issues and long-term absence from the workplace. Adequate measurement of WRS is essential to assess its prevalence, risks, and effectiveness of preventive interventions. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of different categories of WRS assessment: 1) self-assessment, 2) external assessment, and 3) biomarkers. Methods: The databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science have been searched until July 2024 for studies comprising self-assessment or external assessment of WRS, and WRS biomarkers. The self-assessment studies were further evaluated following the COSMIN guidelines. Results: In this review, a total of 15,749 articles were screened. The final analysis included 53 studies on self-assessment of WRS, 33 articles on external assessment of WRS and 167 articles on stress biomarkers. Within self-assessment studies, four instruments were included in the analysis: Job Content Questionnaire, Effort Reward Imbalance Questionnaire, Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II and the Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire. The studies applying external assessment used job-exposure matrices, work register data, ethnography, digital tools, and external observation. The identified WRS biomarkers were associated with the sympathetic adrenal medullary axis, the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis, immune response and inflammation, and haemostatic, metabolic and (epi)genetic biomarkers. Conclusion: The available evidence does not support the claim that there is a singular golden standard for assessing WRS. Inclusion of objective parameters and the interaction with subjective parameters and biological markers has to be studied to receive a broader view of WRS.
- Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: a systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countriesPublication . Guseva Canu, Irina; Marca, Sandy Carla; Dell'Oro, Francesca; Balázs, Ádám; Bergamaschi, Enrico; Besse, Christine; Bianchi, Renzo; Bislimovska, Jovanka; Koscec Bjelajac, Adrijana; Bugge, Merete; Busneag, Carmen Iliana; Çağlayan, Çiğdem; Cernițanu, Mariana; Costa Pereira, Cristiana; Dernovšček Hafner, Nataša; Droz, Nadia; Eglite, Maija; Godderis, Lode; Gündel, Harald; Hakanen, Jari J; Iordache, Raluca Maria; Khireddine-Medouni, Imane; Kiran, Sibel; Larese-Filon, Francesca; Lazor-Blanchet, Catherine; Légeron, Patrick; Loney, Tom; Majery, Nicole; Merisalu, Eda; Mehlum, Ingrid Sivesind; Michaud, Laurent; Mijakoski, Dragan; Minov, Jordan; Modenese, Alberto; Molan, Marija; van der Molen, Henk; Nena, Evangelia; Nolimal, Dusan; Otelea, Marina; Pletea, Elisabeta; Pranjic, Nurka; Rebergen, David; Reste, Jelena; Schernhammer, Eva; Wahlen, AnnyObjective: A consensual definition of occupational burnout is currently lacking. We aimed to harmonize the definition of occupational burnout as a health outcome in medical research and reach a consensus on this definition within the Network on the Coordination and Harmonisation of European Occupational Cohorts (OMEGA-NET). Methods: First, we performed a systematic review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Embase (January 1990 to August 2018) and a semantic analysis of the available definitions. We used the definitions of burnout and burnout-related concepts from the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) to formulate a consistent harmonized definition of the concept. Second, we sought to obtain the Delphi consensus on the proposed definition. Results: We identified 88 unique definitions of burnout and assigned each of them to 1 of the 11 original definitions. The semantic analysis yielded a first proposal, further reformulated according to SNOMED-CT and the panelists` comments as follows: "In a worker, occupational burnout or occupational physical AND emotional exhaustion state is an exhaustion due to prolonged exposure to work-related problems". A panel of 50 experts (researchers and healthcare professionals with an interest for occupational burnout) reached consensus on this proposal at the second round of the Delphi, with 82% of experts agreeing on it. Conclusion: This study resulted in a harmonized definition of occupational burnout approved by experts from 29 countries within OMEGA-NET. Future research should address the reproducibility of the Delphi consensus in a larger panel of experts, representing more countries, and examine the practicability of the definition.
