Percorrer por autor "FitzGerald, Rex"
A mostrar 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opções de ordenação
- Safety evaluation of pectin‐rich extract derived from Coffea arabica as food additivePublication . EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF); Castle, Laurence; Andreassen, Monica; Aquilina, Gabriele; Bastos, Maria Lourdes; Boon, Polly; Fallico, Biagio; FitzGerald, Rex; Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose; Grasl-Kraupp, Bettina; Gundert-Remy, Ursula; Gürtler, Rainer; Houdeau, Eric; Kurek, Marcin; Louro, Henriqueta; Morales, Patricia; Passamonti, Sabina; Barat Baviera, José Manuel; Degen, Gisela; Gott, David; Leblanc, Jean-Charles; Moldeus, Peter; Waalkens-Berendsen, Ine; Wölfle, Detlef; Mech, Agnieszka; Tard, Alexandra; Zakidou, Panagiota; Ruggeri, LauraThe EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) provides a scientific opinion on the safety assessment of the proposed use of pectin rich extract derived from Coffea arabica L. as a food additive. The proposed food additive consists of 70%–85% dietary fibres (of which the major part is pectin), 4%–6.5% proteins and substances of potential concern including caffeine, chlorogenic acid, ■■■■■, caffeic acid, ■■■■■, trigonelline. The Panel integrated all available information including existing EFSA evaluations on pectins, coffee fruit pulp, and conducted a new quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analysis for the substances of potential concern. Studies from literature confirmed that the pectins are not absorbed intact but extensively fermented by intestinal microbiota. No adverse effects were reported in two 90‐day toxicity studies in rats up to 7.8 g/kg body weight (bw) per day and in one human study on sugar beet pectin at 0.2 g/kg bw per day for 4 weeks. The calculated MOE for ■■■■■ indicated that there is a low concern from a public health point of view. The Panel considered that the exposure to caffeine, caffeic acid, ■■■■■, chlorogenic acid, ■■■■■ and trigonelline from use of the proposed food additive would contribute only to a minimal increase over existing dietary exposure and is not of safety concern. Considering the composition of the proposed food additive, the absence of genotoxic concern of its components and lack of adverse effects of the major component (i.e. pectins), the Panel considered that there was no need for a numerical acceptable daily intake. The Panel concluded that the use of pectin‐rich extract derived from Coffea arabica as a new food additive does not raise a safety concern at the proposed use and use levels.
- Scientific opinion on the amendment of the specifications for vegetable carbon (E 153) as a food additivePublication . EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF); Castle, Laurence; Andreassen, Monica; Aquilina, Gabriele; Bastos, Maria Lourdes; Boon, Polly; Fallico, Biagio; FitzGerald, Rex; Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose; Grasl-Kraupp, Bettina; Gundert-Remy, Ursula; Gürtler, Rainer; Houdeau, Eric; Kurek, Marcin; Louro, Henriqueta; Morales, Patricia; Passamonti, Sabina; Furst, Peter; Gaffet, Eric; Loeschner, Katrin; Mast, Jan; Mirat, Manuela; Oomen, Agnes; Undas, Anna; Mech, Agnieszka; Smeraldi, Camilla; Rincon, Ana MariaThe food additive vegetable carbon (E 153) was re‐evaluated by the EFSA ANS Panel in 2012. During that re‐evaluation, data gaps were identified, in particular with respect to impurities and particle characterisation. Following a European Commission call for data to address these gaps, one interested business operator (IBO) submitted analytical data on toxic elements, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and particle size distribution of commercial samples of E 153. The present opinion deals with the assessment of the data provided by the IBO in response to the European Commission call. Based on the analytical data provided, the Panel concluded that the information on toxic elements supports a revision of the current EU specification limits for arsenic, cadmium, mercury and lead, and the introduction of a limit for aluminium. Regarding PAHs, the Panel assessed the risks associated with benzo[a]pyrene and PAH4 under several scenarios and concluded that the resulting margins of exposure (MOE) were above the level of concern but recommended lowering the current limit for benzo[a]pyrene and introducing a limit for PAH4 in the EU specifications for E 153. For what concerns the data on particle size distribution and morphology, the Panel considered that, due to methodological limitations, these data did not allow a full characterisation of the materials used as a food additive and did not adequately support an amendment of the specifications in relation to particle properties. Nevertheless, the Panel concluded that a fraction of small particles, including nanoparticles, is present in vegetable carbon (E 153) and noted that the substance is insoluble in water. Therefore, in line with the EFSA Guidance on Particles‐TR, the Panel concluded that the risk assessment of E 153 performed by the EFSA ANS Panel in 2012 should be complemented with nanoscale considerations.